The best you can hope for is to offer the thing that makes your other thing obsolete.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 12:20 PM Roger Timmerman <timmer...@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like you get 6 accounts for the $35/mo fee. It will be > interesting to watch what they do with Google Fiber TV. Google's own > customers will potentially be cable cutting to go with Youtube TV. > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > > I really miss the regional stations on all Streaming services. WGN and > MeTV in Chicago. You can't even get CLTV (all day Chicago news) on > anything other than Wireline providers. > > > On 3/1/2017 11:33 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > > On 3/1/17 08:17, Chuck McCown wrote: > > “YouTube’s service will cost $35 a month, similar to the cheapest deals > from AT& T’s DirecTV Now and Sony’s PlayStation Vue, but more expensive > than Dish’s Sling TV. It comes with unlimited storage in a cloud DVR; “ > > > > Hmm, I wonder if they'll leverage the existing CDN infrastructure that > already feeds YouTube, especially at internet exchanges. If I have to build > transport somewhere for a competing TV service that's more costly than > YouTube coming off a peering I already have. > > ~Seth > > > >
