I assume these APs are already synced? If it's possible to get some of them onto 5ghz, that would be the way to go... otherwise, I'd say a 40mhz channel on one AP is worth a try.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote: > It isn't too hard to overload the front-end in the ePMP 1k. Just like the > RocketM. I really doubt they're going to do a 2.4 ePMP 2000. > > Can you try a 40MHz channel on one of the 2.4 APs and shut the other one > off? I don't know your setup and terrain, but I would try an ePMP 2k and > off-load the customers with good LOS. > > On 3/1/2017 7:37 PM, Brandon Yuchasz wrote: > > So we have a site where all of the customers are south of the tower and we > have a 2.4 120 degree KP Performance antenna and ePMP AP pointing at those > customers. We have put a lot of SMs onto the AP and before it gets to > congested we wanted to add an additional AP. It turns out most of the > customers are covered by a 90 degree sector so we put up a second 90 degree > sector( again KP ) �on 2.4. I think where we screwed up is we installed > this new sector with 3 feet of horizontal separating from the other sector > and no vertical separation. ( they are side by side pointed in the same > direction) > > � > > When we fired it up the SMs on the other AP started to re reg.� I have > placed one of the APs at the top of the band on 20 mhz and the other on the > bottom on 20 mhz. Its better but they still drop and register over and over. > > � > > � > > So my question is. Has anyone put two 2.4 sectors on the same tower > pointing the same direction successfully? How much vertical separation did > you use? I am assuming vertical is going to be better than what I did. > > � > > How much of a guard band did you use? > > � > > The 120 degree sector is older so it doesn�t have the same shielding on > top and bottom as the newer 90 degree KP sector. Just FYI. > > � > > Thanks, > > Brandon > > � > > � > > � > > � > > >
