The bonding of 10G is the easy part. The management of data flows with regards 
to throughput capabilities on each link is the part that I'm surprised is 
taking so long to mature. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3:00:11 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 



Not a lot of people are trying to bond 10Gbps wireless circuits. Even the 
products themselves are fairly new or still in development. 

Rory 



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 12:57 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 


It's quite surprising that this hasn't happened already. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----


From: "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 2:55:39 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 
It still needs feedback from the radios as far as I can tell but it’s an 
interesting idea. 

Rory 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:48 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 


SDWAN? 



From: Af < af-boun...@afmug.com > on behalf of Rory Conaway < 
r...@triadwireless.net > 
Reply-To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Date: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 12:47 PM 
To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 




Interesting. Just talked to SIAE yesterday and they won’t have radios available 
for a while. I believe we have 2 ideas on the table though, to address this. 

Rory 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 1:02 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 


Seems like you might need some Cisco and SIAE gear? 



http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/unified-ran-backhaul/white_paper_c11-728355.html
 



From: Af < af-boun...@afmug.com > on behalf of Rory Conaway < 
r...@triadwireless.net > 
Reply-To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Date: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 12:20 PM 
To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 




Can be routed or switched. The end result simply needs to be 40Gbps with lower 
speeds optional in harsh weather with minimal latency. 

Rory 

From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 7:57 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 



That was an Accedian product. 



So you need 40Gbps... at a minimum of 8x10Gbps at each end. 


I think MikroTik has an 8 port 10Gbps CCR, but I don't have any experience with 
it. 

Can the hop be routed, or must it be switched? 




        

Gino Villarini 
        
President 
        
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 

        

Gino Villarini 
        
President 
        
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 

On Mar 21, 2017 9:50 AM, "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > wrote: 


Josh, what was that product that you used to rep? 

I actually need 40Gbps across 1 hop with four 10Gbps radios. Just need to 
figure out the best way to do it. Kevin Myers just posted this on Facebook. 

http://www.stubarea51.net/2016/10/27/wisp-design-using-ospf-to-build-a-transit-fabric-over-unequal-links/
 

Rory 

From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 7:48 AM 


To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 


Right. If you need a 10G+ stream, you'll need in-radio bonding. If you just 
need 10+ Gbps of traffic, there are multiple ways to do that. 




On Mar 21, 2017 9:38 AM, "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > wrote: 



Apparently this problem is more difficult than I imagined. Some radio vendors 
do this but apparently not all. 

Rory 

From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 6:23 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 


He can't deploy a product that's not released, homie. 



Even then, it's still brand new. Always best to let others air out the bugs 
unless you did some of the testing yourself and know what to expect ;) 



On Mar 21, 2017 8:19 AM, "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


Your not watching of my videos has failed you. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:15:39 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 

It's not listed on their website I don't believe. Neither of the currently 
listed options mention trill in the data sheet. 



On Mar 21, 2017 6:41 AM, "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


I'd look at IgniteNet's new TRILL switch. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 11:30:07 PM 
Subject: [AFMUG] Best switch for bonding dual 10Gbps radio links 

Lots of options today and redundancy with the switches wouldn’t be a bad thing 
either. 

Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 
4226 S. 37 th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 
602-426-0542 
r...@triadwireless.net 
www.triadwireless.net 

“An optimist will tell you the glass is half-full; the pessimist, half-empty; 
and the engineer will tell you the glass is twice the size it needs to be” 





Reply via email to