Pretty much what we have done. No workee. Cisco to cisco. One circuit goes through an extra card on the Cyan before hitting the passive combiner/mux LAD card. The other circuit hits the LAD directly. They are on two different colors. We are thinking that perhaps that other card that does the ring switching might somehow be messing with LACP messages or some such thing.
From: Eric Muehleisen Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Cisco LACP interface Bundle-Ether3 description Netflix-CDN-20GigLag interface TenGigE0/0/0/2 description Netflix-CDN-Eth1 bundle id 3 mode active lacp period shortinterface TenGigE0/1/0/2 description Netflix-CDN-Eth2 bundle id 3 mode active lacp period short On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: Our complications are having complications... We have two 10G circuits. One is on a ring and the other is direct. Both originate at the same point and terminate at the same point. But one of them has the ability for route diversity. We are trying to bundle them. Not happy. How else can we load balance or bond them or overflow to one when the other is at capacity? From: Josh Baird Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Cisco LACP Don't know specifically, but I bet the answer is burred somewhere deep in this document: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-2/interfaces/configuration/guide/hc42asr9kbook/hc42lbun.pdf On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: asr9000 From: Josh Baird Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Cisco LACP Totally dependent on the hardware/cards that you are using. On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: Trying to put two 10 Gig circuits into one bundle. It appears the router is not happy if they are on different cards. Is it a requirement that bundling circuits must be on the same interface pcb?
