Is there difference in RTT between the 2 circuits?
If so this could be an issue that could cause the bond not to work.
Also, you could be correct about the direct vs multi-path connections.
On 4/12/2017 1:51 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Pretty much what we have done. No workee. Cisco to cisco. One
circuit goes through an extra card on the Cyan before hitting the
passive combiner/mux LAD card. The other circuit hits the LAD
directly. They are on two different colors. We are thinking that
perhaps that other card that does the ring switching might somehow be
messing with LACP messages or some such thing.
*From:* Eric Muehleisen
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:48 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Cisco LACP
interface Bundle-Ether3
description Netflix-CDN-20GigLag
interface TenGigE0/0/0/2
description Netflix-CDN-Eth1
bundle id 3 mode active
lacp period short
interface TenGigE0/1/0/2
description Netflix-CDN-Eth2
bundle id 3 mode active
lacp period short
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
Our complications are having complications...
We have two 10G circuits. One is on a ring and the other is
direct. Both originate at the same point and terminate at the
same point. But one of them has the ability for route diversity.
We are trying to bundle them. Not happy. How else can we load
balance or bond them or overflow to one when the other is at capacity?
*From:* Josh Baird
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:40 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Cisco LACP
Don't know specifically, but I bet the answer is burred somewhere
deep in this document:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-2/interfaces/configuration/guide/hc42asr9kbook/hc42lbun.pdf
<http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-2/interfaces/configuration/guide/hc42asr9kbook/hc42lbun.pdf>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
asr9000
*From:* Josh Baird
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:32 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Cisco LACP
Totally dependent on the hardware/cards that you are using.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Chuck McCown
<[email protected]> wrote:
Trying to put two 10 Gig circuits into one bundle. It
appears the router is not happy if they are on different
cards. Is it a requirement that bundling circuits must be
on the same interface pcb?
--
