Slide didn't come though. Picture the new ePMP 2000 sector antenna with a 450i AP turned backwards and mounted directly on the back of the sector. It's hawt. I want 3GHz too, Matt!

On 5/5/2017 9:42 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:

I want to make sure everyone has the correct information on this topic.

Darin - It was true that when it was first launched, and we had the 90 degree Mars sector antenna, the front-to-back of that antenna was not good enough to do frequency re-use.

However, the current shipping integrated Access Points (part numbers ending in “B”, e.g. C050045A006B) have a Cambium Networks-designed antenna attached (more like a standard tall and narrow sector, rather than a 14” square flat panel). This antenna was built with frequency re-use in mind, and is optimized for use with the 450i platform. It is a true 90 degree sector, and eliminates the need for jumper cables as George mentions.

I have attached a slide highlighting this (if it comes through).

Matt

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Darin Steffl
*Sent:* Friday, May 5, 2017 9:03 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RF attenuators

Be careful with the integrated 450i though as the FTB isn't good enough for gps sync according to cambium.

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:00 AM George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com <mailto:george.sko...@cbcast.com>> wrote:

    Accuracy. Known-good connectorized SMs to verify multiple APs in 3 and
    5GHz. Coaxes and attenuators only. I've used antennas and bare SMs
    pointed up at the ceiling and it's just not reliable. We ended up
    redeploying an old AP that apparently has bad Tx on one polarity.
    Really
    trying to cut down on the BS and multiple tower climbs. Also getting
    really sick of weather-seals leaking for no apparent reason. Which is
    another reason I'm not so mad about the 450AP going away. We'll
    probably
    just start using that fancy new 450i integrated 90 over time. No
    coaxes
    to worry about with that.

    On 5/4/2017 7:23 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
    > Yes.
    > But is there a reason you don't want to use the paper clip trick?
    > Single piece of wire quarter wavelength is all  you need.
    >
    > -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup
    > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017 5:54 PM
    > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
    > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF attenuators
    >
    > So... I'm having bad luck finding 60dB attenuators in DC-6GHz or
    > greater. I found some 50's, but they're only 4GHz. WTF.
    >
    > Stupid question. Can I stack 30's to get 60? I see lots of N to N in
    > 30dB on Amazon. Up to 1W mostly. Looks like for cellular
    amp/repeater
    > type stuff. So I assume they won't have a problem with
    bi-directional Tx.
    >
    > On 5/4/2017 5:33 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
    >> 60 dB pads are what we typically use internally...
    >>
    >> Matt
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
    <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of George Skorup
    >> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 5:31 PM
    >> To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
    >> Subject: [AFMUG] RF attenuators
    >>
    >> I need to RF test some 450 APs with connectorized SMs. What's a
    good
    >> option for N to N attenuators? I'm thinking I want like 60dB so
    >> there's no chance of the SM overloading the AP Rx (because SM Tx
    >> power control doesn't kick in for a few minutes).
    >

--

Darin Steffl

Minnesota WiFi

www.mnwifi.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mnwifi.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cf7b60b12d79b40a1624208d493bf7b79%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636295898004781824&sdata=rrmP83RmOe6XtFxpA%2FsMW0%2B1KZgA%2FTCbPUy2JbDFPDk%3D&reserved=0>

507-634-WiFi

<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fminnesotawifi&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cf7b60b12d79b40a1624208d493bf7b79%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636295898004781824&sdata=mgSlFc4Dd%2BGlkLEACpmy7DmB5VL42Xp0%2BdrrR2qyvz4%3D&reserved=0> Like us on Facebook <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fminnesotawifi&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cf7b60b12d79b40a1624208d493bf7b79%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636295898004781824&sdata=mgSlFc4Dd%2BGlkLEACpmy7DmB5VL42Xp0%2BdrrR2qyvz4%3D&reserved=0>


Reply via email to