do I read this correct, cambium shipped a product that didn't meet their
own spec?
are they making right, as in shipping replacements at no cost?
not being a dick, their reuse has always been phenomenal, even though they
to this day refuse to admit the Motorola 320 doesn't sync for ABAB


On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:00 PM, George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com>
wrote:

> Slide didn't come though. Picture the new ePMP 2000 sector antenna with a
> 450i AP turned backwards and mounted directly on the back of the sector.
> It's hawt. I want 3GHz too, Matt!
>
> On 5/5/2017 9:42 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
>
> I want to make sure everyone has the correct information on this topic.
>
>
>
> Darin - It was true that when it was first launched, and we had the 90
> degree Mars sector antenna, the front-to-back of that antenna was not good
> enough to do frequency re-use.
>
>
>
> However, the current shipping integrated Access Points (part numbers
> ending in “B”, e.g. C050045A006B) have a Cambium Networks-designed antenna
> attached (more like a standard tall and narrow sector, rather than a 14”
> square flat panel).  This antenna was built with frequency re-use in mind,
> and is optimized for use with the 450i platform.  It is a true 90 degree
> sector, and eliminates the need for jumper cables as George mentions.
>
>
>
> I have attached a slide highlighting this (if it comes through).
>
>
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Darin Steffl
> *Sent:* Friday, May 5, 2017 9:03 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RF attenuators
>
>
>
> Be careful with the integrated 450i though as the FTB isn't good enough
> for gps sync according to cambium.
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:00 AM George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com>
> wrote:
>
> Accuracy. Known-good connectorized SMs to verify multiple APs in 3 and
> 5GHz. Coaxes and attenuators only. I've used antennas and bare SMs
> pointed up at the ceiling and it's just not reliable. We ended up
> redeploying an old AP that apparently has bad Tx on one polarity. Really
> trying to cut down on the BS and multiple tower climbs. Also getting
> really sick of weather-seals leaking for no apparent reason. Which is
> another reason I'm not so mad about the 450AP going away. We'll probably
> just start using that fancy new 450i integrated 90 over time. No coaxes
> to worry about with that.
>
> On 5/4/2017 7:23 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
> > Yes.
> > But is there a reason you don't want to use the paper clip trick?
> > Single piece of wire quarter wavelength is all  you need.
> >
> > -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup
> > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2017 5:54 PM
> > To: af@afmug.com
> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RF attenuators
> >
> > So... I'm having bad luck finding 60dB attenuators in DC-6GHz or
> > greater. I found some 50's, but they're only 4GHz. WTF.
> >
> > Stupid question. Can I stack 30's to get 60? I see lots of N to N in
> > 30dB on Amazon. Up to 1W mostly. Looks like for cellular amp/repeater
> > type stuff. So I assume they won't have a problem with bi-directional Tx.
> >
> > On 5/4/2017 5:33 PM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
> >> 60 dB pads are what we typically use internally...
> >>
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 5:31 PM
> >> To: af@afmug.com
> >> Subject: [AFMUG] RF attenuators
> >>
> >> I need to RF test some 450 APs with connectorized SMs. What's a good
> >> option for N to N attenuators? I'm thinking I want like 60dB so
> >> there's no chance of the SM overloading the AP Rx (because SM Tx
> >> power control doesn't kick in for a few minutes).
> >
>
> --
>
> Darin Steffl
>
> Minnesota WiFi
>
> www.mnwifi.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mnwifi.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cf7b60b12d79b40a1624208d493bf7b79%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636295898004781824&sdata=rrmP83RmOe6XtFxpA%2FsMW0%2B1KZgA%2FTCbPUy2JbDFPDk%3D&reserved=0>
>
> 507-634-WiFi
>
>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fminnesotawifi&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cf7b60b12d79b40a1624208d493bf7b79%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636295898004781824&sdata=mgSlFc4Dd%2BGlkLEACpmy7DmB5VL42Xp0%2BdrrR2qyvz4%3D&reserved=0>
>  Like us on Facebook
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fminnesotawifi&data=02%7C01%7Cmatt.mangriotis%40cambiumnetworks.com%7Cf7b60b12d79b40a1624208d493bf7b79%7C0e263e36340946228ac818d993e76eb6%7C1%7C0%7C636295898004781824&sdata=mgSlFc4Dd%2BGlkLEACpmy7DmB5VL42Xp0%2BdrrR2qyvz4%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>

Reply via email to