Hey don’t even mention Mimosa B11 in this discussion then… From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of "eric.kuh...@gmail.com<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Date: Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 9:16 PM To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 Experiences
Looking again at the datasheet for 56 MHz channels, dual polarity MIMO, the claim is just a little bit more than 680 Mbps full duplex in its maximum capacity configuration. Which should be a real world 640-650 Mbps. Gino A. Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 [cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png] On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote: Similar to any other airFiber... they'll pretty consistently do about 90% of the stated capacity with real traffic. We're running the full 56mhz/MIMO... I haven't been able to get them to run at 1024qam yet (antennas still need to be fine tuned, it wasn't ideal weather conditions when we put them up, so I'm hoping we'll be able to get a bit more out them), so they're only at around 550Mbps capacity (and I've verified the link will do around 500Mbps with real traffic). On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com<mailto:n...@blastcomm.com>> wrote: Have you run BW tests on it? what kind of throughput are you 'really' seeing? What Channel size Mimo/siso etc. On 5/25/2017 7:42 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: We have one up... other than some very ugly issues right after we put it up (which was apparently a bug in the firmware they shipped with... upgrading to the latest beta firmware fixed it), it has been working perfectly, and I haven't touched it since. The AF11 is certainly worth a look in my opinion, but it all depends on what you need it to do. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net<mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote: Ignoring a few software bugs and delayed fixes, it's good for '2nd string' links. If this is for high priority link, I'd try SIAE or Cambium. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. On May 25, 2017, at 2:46 PM, SmarterBroadband <<mailto:li...@sbb.net>li...@sbb.net<mailto:li...@sbb.net>> wrote: We are looking to add some more Licensed Links to our network. Does anyone actually have the AF11 in service. Is it worth a look? How is it performing for you? Any issues? Just not sure if it is worth considering or should I be looking at existing companied like; Exalt ? Dragonwave ? SAIE ? Or newer ones like Alcoma Cablefree FOR3 Anyone tried the last two? Just looking for best bang for the buck in non core ring usage.
