lewis, what city is that project in ohio in? On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did skim it. I guess you could read it either way but you are likely > right. Still seems a bit high. I am only familiar with one other Muni dark > fiber project in Ohio and they are having a difficult time trying to recoup > their cost and leave enough margin for a provider to take it the last step > profitably. Who knows; maybe this will work. > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I am 100% Calix, one hand hole per two homes, 100% underground. >> >> *From:* Roger Timmerman >> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 9:10 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R >> >> We are hitting about $1450 per address passed, and $1000 per home >> connected all-in expenses. >> >> Roger >> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> I can do a home for about $3500 >>> >>> *From:* Lewis Bergman >>> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2017 6:24 AM >>> *To:* Animal Farm >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R >>> >>> Got the title right this time. Man...slightly over $8000 per address >>> passed. That seems really steep. No wonder nobody wanted to do it. If they >>> get 80% of addresses passed that is a bit over $10k per customer. >>> >>> What is you fiber guys experience overlaying FTTH over non FTTH delivery? >>> >> >> >
