So what we are saying is the private business can do things more cost effectively than government? Wow, so shocking 😉
Layne Sisk ServerPlus 801.426.8283, ext 102<tel:801.426.8283%2C%20ext%20102> [New logo xl]<http://www.serverplus.com/> [http://i.imgur.com/VOz763A.png] [http://i.imgur.com/xvQYYWa.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ServerPlus365/> [http://i.imgur.com/ELG0AB1.png]<https://twitter.com/RealServerPlus> [Utah 100] [fast50-01] [Inc 5000] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 10:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R lewis, what city is that project in ohio in? On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Lewis Bergman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I did skim it. I guess you could read it either way but you are likely right. Still seems a bit high. I am only familiar with one other Muni dark fiber project in Ohio and they are having a difficult time trying to recoup their cost and leave enough margin for a provider to take it the last step profitably. Who knows; maybe this will work. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:13 AM Chuck McCown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I am 100% Calix, one hand hole per two homes, 100% underground. From: Roger Timmerman Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 9:10 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R We are hitting about $1450 per address passed, and $1000 per home connected all-in expenses. Roger On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I can do a home for about $3500 From: Lewis Bergman Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 6:24 AM To: Animal Farm Subject: [AFMUG] Muni F I B E R Got the title right this time. Man...slightly over $8000 per address passed. That seems really steep. No wonder nobody wanted to do it. If they get 80% of addresses passed that is a bit over $10k per customer. What is you fiber guys experience overlaying FTTH over non FTTH delivery?
