what does it cost to submit a correction on a link? say we register 2' and go up to 3, or vise versa?
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > does mimosa have max EIRP and antenna gain setting, assuming it has atpc, > I love atpc > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> Turn it down until you are. You still have the benefit of more RX gain >> on both ends. >> >> *From:* Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 19, 2017 1:52 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] licensing for bigger antennas than installed in >> 11ghz >> >> that's what I figured. I assume putting in a bigger antenna than is >> licensed benefits in terms of pattern but then I'm no longer legal on EIRP? >> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Considering their goal of reducing interference through more directional >>> antennas, I'm sure that installing a different antenna than licensed, >>> especially a smaller one, is a big no. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> we have some links we are about to license, we can "get by" with 2' >>>> antennas, but one is right on that margin. >>>> we can do 2' all day long at all the sites involved, anything bigger >>>> and wed have to do some retrofits that will create some other issues, not a >>>> huge deal, just prefer to not have to deal with the repercussions >>>> we would like to have some troubleshooting flexibility down the road. >>>> maybe a 4 and a 2 or 2 3s, just depending on how the actual path performs >>>> over time >>>> so can we do that, license them all with 3 or 4' and install 2' today? >>>> I'm thinking no because of the antenna patterns on the PCNs not being >>>> as narrow with the smaller antenna, but id like to hear its totally doable >>>> with fcc blessing and they'll even send a guy with a rope to pull them up >>>> for us >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
