We've had a lot of issues with almost all the revs of modules mostly with
airfiber. I can't quite pin down who's to blame. But on many sites if we
have airfiber x we just remove the modules if we have problems.

On Jul 29, 2017 12:40 PM, "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> wrote:

> I think I've seen this mentioned a few times now. Maybe Steve and a couple
> others?
>
> The latest revision (D?) is causing CRC/FCS errors and random link drops.
> Taking the SS out makes all problems go away.
>
> Definitely more issues at gigabit. I have multiple sites with some UBNT
> and ePMP stuff (no sync over power). Some I've turned off gigabit
> negotiation and get only a few FCS errors here and there. Running gigabit
> sees lots more errors and adds a 2-3 second link loss randomly which is a
> big issue on a PTP link.
>
> Got a couple sites with 450i APs. One that I was working with the other
> day is a new radio (because the old one blew up). New cable, new GigE-APC,
> new PacketFlux PowerInjector. The link tries to negotiate gigabit, but
> falls back to 100 after a few tries. Turned off sync over power just to see
> and still no gigabit. Remove the SS and it works fine.
>
> Floating the shield makes no difference. Running the site on battery also
> makes no difference. Some FM sites, some water towers, some elevators, some
> regular towers with only our stuff on it.
>
> The stuff I was working with yesterday is a new UBNT Prism PTP radio, new
> GigE-APC, new CCR1009. This site also has an Exalt G2-11 fed by an older
> GigE-POE-APC and I get no errors on that. It used to be plugged into a
> MikroTik CRS210 and I didn't see any errors on that either.
>
> I had far fewer issues with the older cards. Unfortunately I don't think I
> have any good ones left to do a comparison. I do have a couple that got
> some water in the jack, maybe I can clean those up for testing. I've used
> maybe 10 of the new ones now and they all seem to be causing issues. And
> before you ask, yes, I've tried dumb gigabit switches at a few sites
> temporarily and still see the random link loss with the SS in line.
>
>
>

Reply via email to