Mimosa B5 is certified for 4.9ghz i think.

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Nope, didn't see it. Completely missed where it switched to other from US
> when I selected 4.9 as well. Bummer.
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 4:32 PM George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Did you not see what Matt said just a couple hours ago? ePMP is *NOT*
>> certified for 4.9 in the US.
>>
>>
>> On 8/25/2017 4:19 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>
>> It does.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:37 AM George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I asked if ePMP could do 4.9 for some public safety stuff we were working
>>> on and was told no.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/25/2017 9:58 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>>
>>> Yea, AF won't do the whole band whle the Cambium stuff does. Either
>>> Force 200 or 450i covers 4.9 through 5. Handy.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:54 AM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> AirFiber 4.9GHz radio
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 25, 2017 9:42 AM, <s...@genias.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> AF-4X ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Dave
>>>>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 25. August 2017 16:37
>>>>> *An:* af@afmug.com
>>>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] 450i or alternative
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, Worth looking at just the epmp1000 connectorized and use your
>>>>> own antennas.
>>>>> use force 180's for the clients.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/23/2017 07:15 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am putting up a link for a library and I originally quoted the 450i
>>>>> about a year ago. This link goes to a Sheriff's department so could use
>>>>> 4.9G so I would like the product to at least be capable of that band. GPS
>>>>> sync would be nice as they have plans for another link in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. Is the 450i still having the water penetration issue?
>>>>>    2. Is there a better Cambium product out there at or around the
>>>>>    same price point? Say...no more than double?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to