Is anyone else worried about the C2758 ( C2K ) problems with the atom
chips? I keep waiting for a decent availability of C3K chips to start
upgrading systems
On 10/16/17 5:56 PM, George Skorup wrote:
I'm running several Supermicro 5018A-FTN4's. That's an 8-core Atom. 16GB
of RAM. CentOS 7. And named uses like 3% of the CPU. Looking at one of
them, it's hitting about 400 PPS. Using Torch anyway. The named process
is using about 350MB of RAM.
I've got 4 of these in an anycast config. So this one I'm looking at
right now, just going from memory of how I have things routed, it's
probably serving about 900 or 1k customers. So yeah, I don't think a Pi
would struggle too much with some DNS caching.
On 10/16/2017 10:45 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
i havent ordered the rig yet for this purpose, too many other things
we run our current vm single core 1gb ram i cant see the pi rig will
perform worse
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Darin Steffl
<darin.ste...@mnwifi.com <mailto:darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>> wrote:
Bump.
Hello,
Will the latest Raspberry Pi 3 model with quad-core processor be
able to handle a significant DNS load with Unbound running on
Linux? I can't seem to find much data out there showing what to
expect for performance with different CPU and hardware options.
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Darin Steffl
<darin.ste...@mnwifi.com <mailto:darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Will the latest Raspberry Pi 3 model with quad-core processor
be able to handle a significant DNS load with Unbound running
on Linux? I can't seem to find much data out there showing
what to expect for performance with different CPU and hardware
options.
Thanks
--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
507-634-WiFi
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
<http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>