is there a tool thats good for generating those kinds of graphs in bind? and is there a rule of thumb on queries/sec per #subs that is expected?
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Graham McIntire <gra...@vntx.net> wrote: > We run our primary resolvers on Raspberry Pis with unbound. I routinely > test them against GRC's DNS benchmark test https://www.grc.com/dns/ > benchmark.htm and they come out significantly faster than any other > server out of the entire list. Been using Pi2s for 2+ years now without a > single hiccup and just upgraded them to pi3 this week. > > Here's some graphs to show how heavily they're used: > http://g.vntx.net/a72a8dc4-4804-4fe0-b6d1-1cd279b4070e.png > > And the cpu usage for the same period: > http://g.vntx.net/5e0b9e98-f774-4057-a1d0-2b37c15bde37.png > > Graham McIntire > Verona Networks > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would used Centos 7. I had trouble with older unbound versions included >> with centos and some newer domain extensions. Installed epel on Centos >> then PowerDNS. Works great. Used Pi for a bit, plenty power, but switched >> to using a VM on Proxmox now. I don't think anything that can run a modern >> linux os is going to even notice a DNS server running. They consume so few >> resources even with thousands of users. >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Darin Steffl <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Will the latest Raspberry Pi 3 model with quad-core processor be able to >>> handle a significant DNS load with Unbound running on Linux? I can't seem >>> to find much data out there showing what to expect for performance with >>> different CPU and hardware options. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> -- >>> Darin Steffl >>> Minnesota WiFi >>> www.mnwifi.com >>> 507-634-WiFi >>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook >>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >>> >> >> >
