I read the proposed changes....but it was awhile ago.
One thing I was never clear on was whether we could still use channels
that aren't licensed or aren't deployed in our area. Under this
proposed rule, if the SAS knows that nobody has used a channel in our
area, then could we use it?
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <jeffl...@att.net>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 10/25/2017 8:49:34 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future
Actually, yesterday was full of good signs. Still very early though.
I wouldn’t get too high or too low right now.
Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
On Oct 25, 2017, at 8:38 AM, Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote:
Doesn’t look good
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David Milholen
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 8:36 AM
To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] 3.5Ghz future
Seems we will be left in the cold!
https://insidetowers.com/daily-tower-news-controversial-changes-3-5-ghz/?utm_source=Inside+Towers+List&utm_campaign=bfd6d8f22b-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_10_22&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_af16c4fc22-bfd6d8f22b-74919777&goal=0_af16c4fc22-bfd6d8f22b-74919777
Anybody wanna buy an all cambium wisp?
theres nothing to see under the hood LOL
--
<image001.jpg>
