> This is the first I've heard of adaptive channel sizes.. 

Not trying to throw a curve ball... but it is one of the 'quiet, open disclosed 
secret of the Mimosa A5/PTMP system :) 

Regards. 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
http://www.snappytelecom.net 

Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 1:04:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Quick comparison between 80GHz and AF24

> This is the first I've heard of adaptive channel sizes... I've been looking at
> both Siklu and Bridgewater, and nobody from either company ever mentioned that
> (that doesn't necessarily mean they can't do it though).

> On Jan 20, 2018 11:58 AM, "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > wrote:

>> Adaptive channel sizes?

>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions

>> Midwest Internet Exchange

>> The Brothers WISP

>> From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com >
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2018 11:48:24 AM

>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Quick comparison between 80GHz and AF24

>> This is not extremely new in 80 GHz, just with different and denser 
>> modulations.
>> The Siklu 80 GHz stuff has done adaptive coding and modulation for a while. 
>> The
>> (now 7 year old!) Bridgewave adaptrate 80 GHz stuff would maintain a 100 Mbps
>> link during a rain fade, by switching a nominally QPSK-modulated 1500 MHz 
>> wide
>> channel for 1 Gbps, temporarily down to BPSK during a rain fade event.

>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Stefan Englhardt < s...@genias.net > wrote:

>>> Some vendors do some new things to stretch the range of 80GHz:

>>> http://de.nec.com/de_DE/global/prod/nw/pasolink/products/ipasolinkEX_advanced.html
>>> ?

>>> They modulate down and then reduce channel size.

>>> This gear is in the 20kEuro Range …

>>> Von: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Januar 2018 17:08
>>> An: af@afmug.com
>>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Quick comparison between 80GHz and AF24

>>> We have two things to contend with...

>>> one is Oxygen Absorption

>>> second is Rain Fade

>>> Science says, 24ghz has much less O2 absorption fade vs 80ghz

>>> Science also says that 24ghz has slightly less Rain fade vs 80ghz

>>> Science also says that if on a particular link, if one is comparing 24ghz vs
>>> 80ghz, the difference in which link drops first will be based on the TX 
>>> power /
>>> Antenna Gain and Rx sensitivity.

>>> If all things were exactly the same, then 80ghz would drop before 24ghz in 
>>> Rain
>>> event.

>>> But in reality, all things are not the same.. I believe 80ghz one is allowed
>>> more power, and higher antenna gain.

>>> https://www.e-band.com/index.php?id=86

>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dont-fall-siklu-overbuilds-distance-claims-david-theodore

>>> at 3.5miles, one is pushing the limits of both 24gzh as well as 80ghz..
>>> Depending on what you are trying to achieve, and the rainzone, you can make
>>> your choice based on what will perform better normally... cause both of them
>>> will go out in rain :)

>>> Best of Luck

>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> http://www.snappytelecom.net

>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

>>>> From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com >
>>>> To: "af" < af@afmug.com >
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 8:42:31 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Quick comparison between 80GHz and AF24
>>>> I'd guess 24ghz would be slightly better, but either one is going to drop 
>>>> at
>>>> that distance if you ever get heavy rain.

>>>> Somebody from Siklu told me at one time, that some of their customers have 
>>>> told
>>>> then that their rainfade is slightly better than an AF24, but slightly 
>>>> worse
>>>> than an AF24HD... how accurate that is, I don't know.

>>>> On Jan 19, 2018 6:03 PM, "Rory Conaway" < r...@triadwireless.net > wrote:

>>>>> I haven’t run the numbers so please save me some time. Which one has less 
>>>>> fade
>>>>> margin at 3.5 miles? I was going to use Siklu with a 2’ antenna.

>>>>> Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO

>>>>> 4226 S. 37 th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040

>>>>> 602-426-0542

>>>>> r...@triadwireless.net

>>>>> www.triadwireless.net

>>>>> “"Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough 
>>>>> features
>>>>> yet." — Scott Adams

Reply via email to