While I have not read it, I think this is truly what NN is suppose to be.  You 
can’t block content, etc, no paid lanes, such as Netflix and such.  I think 
that is perfeifcly fine, it was the Title II regulations that I did not want or 
like.  With that said, I have not read it, and if it is just that, then I fully 
support it.  ☺  There is not an issue with requiring ISPs to provide “the 
internet” note that that also should apply to any transport etc providers as 
well..


Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant
MikroTik Certified 
Trainer/Consultant<http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5>
 – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE

For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/>
Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com<http://www.towercoverage.com/>
Office: 314-735-0270
E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net>

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:11 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Montana Governor Signs Order to Force Net Neutrality - The 
New York Times

I think there is NN irrespective of whatever laws they pass.  Market forces 
will cause it to happen.

From: Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 9:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Montana Governor Signs Order to Force Net Neutrality - The 
New York Times

Chuck said the NN thing is over....
How would this be enforced on the cellular side. Sprints offering cap free 
netflix, isnt that a violation of NN?
If state funding has gone into any "coops" like it has here, how does that work 
if the "coop" no longer chooses to abide by NN. Can montana retroactively alter 
the contract?

On Jan 22, 2018 10:00 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/technology/montana-net-neutrality.html?referer=https://news.google.com/
Jaime Solorza

Reply via email to