You have 2.5G ports on that AP do you? Fascinating.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:12 AM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > Being able to load a 450m AP with 80 subs and deliver 30mbps service to all > of them at peak Netflix time in a 20mhz channel without breaking a sweat is > worth every penny. > > But it’s one tool in the tool box and isn’t the best solution for every > deployment. > > 2 cents > > -sean > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:32 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >> The more I dig into MU-MIMO, the more I realize it's not all that great. >> >> I am far more excited by the 9 client simultaneous transmissions in >> 802.11ax via OFDMA. >> >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:00 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > 450 still does a few things that ePMP doesn't. >> > Plus there's that 14 chain MU-MIMO thing......ePMP will probably never >> > have >> > something like that. >> > UI is still sluggish on ePMP. >> > >> > On the other hand ePMP has gotten so many feature improvements over >> > these >> > past few years that it's gotten really hard to argue with the value it >> > provides. >> > >> > >> > ------ Original Message ------ >> > From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> >> > To: af@afmug.com >> > Sent: 2/12/2018 8:27:56 PM >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp >> > >> > The UI server was probably the worst I have ever seen. >> > >> > So, less than 25 subs per site, what speed packages do you sell to those >> > 25? >> > >> > Packetflux GPS sync. >> > >> > From: Joe Novak >> > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 5:20 PM >> > To: af@afmug.com >> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp >> > >> > What didn't you like about it? The interface came a long way since the >> > early >> > days of EPMP. We've got quite a bit deployed. A lot of people are having >> > weird GPS situations come up with the on-board GPS, we have this problem >> > once in a while too. Our packetflux sites are rock solid though. That is >> > assuming density isn't more then 25 per AP, because then I don't exactly >> > have enough experience with it. Most of our APs are sitting right around >> > 25 >> > customers, and according to airtime we still have quite a bit of room. >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Jaime Solorza >> > <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I separated frequencies to three I found cleanest on AFx5s...On Rockets >> >> and Powerbeams I choose one frequency and shut off the rest on APs and >> >> on >> >> PowerBeams I only use two...this method has worked well since August of >> >> 2017 >> >> when I replaced all the radios on this network and have had to change >> >> them >> >> since. Two of the WISPs live in Fabens and work with us on issues. >> >> The >> >> other one from El Paso uses my services once in a while and works with >> >> us as >> >> well. Texas Gas put up allot of 5GHz units around Fabens but still no >> >> issues. I used larger dishes at Wells and lift stations as well. >> >> >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> >> >> On Feb 12, 2018 4:50 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Two AF5x on same tower, One AP on second tower 20 ft away...all other >> >>> radios within 4 mile radius... >> >>> >> >>> Jaime Solorza >> >>> >> >>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:43 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> All on the same tower, right? >> >>>> >> >>>> From: Jaime Solorza >> >>>> Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:41 PM >> >>>> To: Animal Farm >> >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp >> >>>> >> >>>> Yes..I have two AF5X links as PTP and 25 radios all in 5 GHz off 4 >> >>>> APs >> >>>> in Fabens, Texas sharing spectrum with 3 WISPs...no issues... >> >>>> >> >>>> Jaime Solorza >> >>>> >> >>>> On Feb 12, 2018 4:32 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Talking to a friend that wants to build a small wisp. He is about >> >>>>> 5.5 >> >>>>> miles from a backbone connection. I would suggest AF5X to him but >> >>>>> he is >> >>>>> gonna want to use 5 GHz for his wisp I presume. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Can an AF5X and some 5 GHz cambium (or others) access points >> >>>>> peacefully >> >>>>> coexist on a tower? >> >>>>> Very rural area. Not expecting much interference other than home >> >>>>> routers. >> > >> >
