Do like all other developers make it the standard because it will change again in a year,but wont be a standard till the next. If folks are still running XP then it may force them to find a better solution.  I have used Firefox for as long as I can remember and only because I live in a linux world. I am hoping for more great solutions to port to linux natively without wine but it only takes time.


On 03/14/2018 06:49 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
A bit of a survey here....

A couple of features I'm looking at for current/future products would be much easier to implement using a certain feature found only in relatively new web browsers, aka, Chrome/Firefox/Edge updated within the last year.

One specific browser feature I'm looking at is webassembly.  Various tools out there indicate that around 87% of the installed/active browsers on the internet are recent enough for native support.   Most of the browsers gained support for this feature early to mid last year.   With autoupdates being the rule instead of the exception, anyone on a recent auto-updating web browser should support this.  I'm mostly concerned about 'the rest'.

Support for the older browsers is possible, but it adds a level of complexity (specifically a level of testing) which I would prefer not to do if I could get away without it.

To be clear:  Almost all of the functionality of the upcoming products won't require these functions.  A specific example of something that might require this is setting up the scripting functionality as I'm looking at various technologies which would work best if I could run a chunk of webassembly code in the browser as part of the code editor.  However, other than editing a script, the rest of the functionality would work fine.

Thoughts?

--
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com <mailto:forre...@imach.com> | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>



--

Reply via email to