Are you restricted in antenna size at both ends? If one could be larger,
that would get you the range.
--
bp
part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think he needs a bigger channel size than you can do in 6GHz.
>
> --
> bp
> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <jeffl...@att.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I’m not aware of that change in 6GHz.
>>
>> Have you checked with Comsearch to see about 11GHz. Liz is my go-to, but
>> Comsearch has access to information no one else seems to have.
>>
>> Jeff Broadwick
>> CTIconnect
>> 312-205-2519 Office
>> 574-220-7826 Cell
>> jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2018, at 5:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>Fcc changed the rules. You can do 2’ in 6ghz now.
>>
>> Can you please share the ref where and when this was changed ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz
>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>>
>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>
>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us>
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Thursday, April 19, 2018 4:59:57 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity
>>
>> Fcc changed the rules. You can do 2’ in 6ghz now.
>>
>> Why are you limited to 2’ dishes??
>>
>> Can you do a 2’ and 3’ (or 4’)??
>>
>> What you are trying to do breaks the laws of physics no matter who’s
>> equipment you use.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:42 PM SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Love to but 11 GHz is all gone. I don’t think you can do 2 foot dishes
>>> at 6 GHz?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2018 3:51 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> what rain zone are you in?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> yes our link is in 18GHz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> honestly if you need 1gbps with 4.5 nines with 2' dishes at 6 miles you
>>> probably need to look at 11GHz or 6GHz instead of 18GHz.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -sean
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:08 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cambium 820's will be down to around 400 meg at 4.5 nines.
>>>
>>> We want the link to hold 1 Gig at 4.5 nines.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:53 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity
>>>
>>> What does link planner say you need?
>>>
>>> Five nines I presume?
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>> On 4/18/2018 1:12 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>>> > Yes, looking at both.
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 12:44 PM
>>> > To: af@afmug.com
>>> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity
>>> >
>>> > On 4/18/18 12:31 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
>>> >> SAF seems to have the lowest output power I have seen…. Especially
>>> >> the G and GS.
>>> >
>>>
>>> > I would look at the RX sensitivity tables.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
