I usually see: NLOS = Non Line-of-Sight nLOS = near Line-of-Sight
------------------------------ On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:28 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Interesting, I didn’t now little “n” had a definition. > > *From:* Steve Jones > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 25, 2018 9:45 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PTP650, PTP550, NLOS > > They claim nLOS not NLOS. To cambium, 1/16 fresnel impact is nLOS > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 5:52 PM Christopher Gray <cg...@graytechsoftware.com> > wrote: > >> I'm definitely not expecting Cambium to go through a forest in 5 GHz... >> but they specifically claim NLOS capability. >> >> I have several NLOS 5 GHz links going through leaves at very short ranges >> that are relatively stable (all ePMP). I'm just curious about what makes >> them claim their NLOS is better. >> >> I'll look into the subcarries as Stanners suggested. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> NLOS "magic" in 5ghz? Don't hold your breath, man. >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:10 PM, Christopher Gray < >>> cg...@graytechsoftware.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been told the PTP650 (and 670) have some sort of magic that helps >>>> with NLOS links. I've always assume this was a result of the custom >>>> chipset. Do these radios actually perform better than others in similar >>>> signal NLOS environments? >>>> >>>> The PTP550 is based on a WiFi chipset... does it have any of the NLOS >>>> magic? >>>> >>>> >>>> In NLOS situations, would the PTP650 / PTP550 be expected to >>>> significantly outperform the airFiber-X hardware? >>>> >>>> Thank you - Chris >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
