Capacity reading...not actual throughput Jaime Solorza
On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:12 AM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > is traffic saturating the link? > i'm not sure what you mean by this sentence "but latency is high even > though stats says 176.5 from possible 177mbps possible.." > > if you are using 176.5Mbps of 177mbps then the link is saturated and > latency is high because packets are being delayed due to the high usage. > > -sean > > > > > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Like this >> >> Jaime Solorza >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018, 2:10 PM Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> How high is high? Could it be some type of QoS setting? One possible >>> option would be to note settings/licenses and then do a reset to defaults >>> of the radios. >>> >>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Email me off list....strange issue..no dropped packets, no BER alarms, >>>> rsl difference from install readings but latency is high even though stats >>>> says 176.5 from possible 177mbps possible.. >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>> >>> >
