I know a guy in Midland who's company has two tower crews. I know they do microwave but I have no idea what their expertise is like. Most of those guys have to have their hand held by a real tech. I can give him a call if you like.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:13 AM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Capacity reading...not actual throughput > > > Jaime Solorza > > On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:12 AM Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > >> is traffic saturating the link? >> i'm not sure what you mean by this sentence "but latency is high even >> though stats says 176.5 from possible 177mbps possible.." >> >> if you are using 176.5Mbps of 177mbps then the link is saturated and >> latency is high because packets are being delayed due to the high usage. >> >> -sean >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> Like this >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> >>> On Tue, May 15, 2018, 2:10 PM Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> How high is high? Could it be some type of QoS setting? One possible >>>> option would be to note settings/licenses and then do a reset to defaults >>>> of the radios. >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Jaime Solorza < >>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Email me off list....strange issue..no dropped packets, no BER alarms, >>>>> rsl difference from install readings but latency is high even though stats >>>>> says 176.5 from possible 177mbps possible.. >>>>> >>>>> Jaime Solorza >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>
