On 22 Jan 2016, at 10:37, Mukom Akong T. wrote:
Before we put out training material on our training website, it has to
meet
criterial that the team has agree upon and for now that's not the
case.
whilst i may respect your adherence to quality control, i’m in general
agreement that half is better than zero …
(this is equally true for the arabic material that was translated by
volunteers, or for the portuguese ipv6 material that nic.br offered,
which used to be on the afrinic site, before the site was re-skinned. i
am sure you can put a simple “disclaimer” about the publications, to
show that you haven’t QA’d them, eh?).
Our certification initiatives is about a standardised
test/examination -
which is still one of the best ways to reinforce learning. We've
gotten
lots of requests from our delegates for a "Certificate of Attendance"
(we
currently don't) but when we launch our certification platform, we'll
be
able to give people who need that something with global recognition.
i’ve said my piece on this, and, to be clear, i wasn’t referring
specifically to your certification plans (which i know nothing about),
but to those unscrupulous ones that see this as an revenue source.
perhaps you’ll be a welcome change.
—n.
_______________________________________________
AfrIPv6-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/afripv6-discuss
