Yeah I know your project is pretty cool :)

Two questions:

-Where is AIGO right now?
-Any open source parts?

Cheers,
Stefan

On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 18:50, <pe...@optimal.org> wrote:

> Some simple demos we did 3 years ago using our technology
>
>
>
> https://youtu.be/NMHEynOLtKE
>
>
>
> https://youtu.be/7jIS5IUgVrw
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Stefan Reich via AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 4, 2018 4:55 AM
> *To:* AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com>
> *Cc:* a...@listbox.com
> *Subject:* Re: [agi] What kind of AGI research program would you propose?
>
>
>
> > To that end, lets say ou
> had ten million dollars (or some other large but finite sum), how would
> 
> you invest that towards AGI?
> 
> I would continue what I do - creating the ultimate user experience
> <https://www.meetup.com/Artificial-Intelligence-Meetup/events/255936823/>.
> 
> That way, we can also help the AI learn by having it learn interactively
> together with users. 3 eyes (2 human eyes, a web cam and a screenshot
> module) see more than, uh... 2 eyes, right? =)
> 
> Specifically, I want to build an interactive image recognition. User says:
> "Look at the round thing there", which activates the circle search module.
> And so on.
> 
> Today's software interfaces are dearly lacking in AI.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Stefan
> 
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 07:50, Alan Grimes <alonz...@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> While I don't really have enough to eat right now, I can't stop thinking
> about AI. =\
> 
> Check out one of intel's few interesting products... Unfortunately it's
> server only, available only through OEMs and has some weirdness going on
> with it's PCI-E connector (it should only require an x8 slot but it
> requires a mechanically x16 slot...)
> 
> Still, very intriguing hardware!
> 
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/programmable/products/boards_and_kits/dev-kits/altera/acceleration-card-arria-10-gx.html
> 
> https://www.micron.com/products/advanced-solutions/advanced-computing-solutions/hpc-single-board-accelerators
> 
> AMD has done a really poor job of advertising the capabilities of their
> hardware in physics and/or AI simulation use. =\
> Nvidia, of course, has a suite of products ranging from single boards up
> to massive rack systems.
> 
> From the software department, we don't have too too much to get excited
> about...
> 
> https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.06936
> https://labs.iuii.ua.es/3dperceptionlab/
> 
> It can be a useful excercise to consider what you would do if you had
> vastly more resources than you currently do. To that end, lets say ou
> had ten million dollars (or some other large but finite sum), how would
> you invest that towards AGI?  What currently existing technologies would
> you use in your project? When in your project would you buy large scale
> hardware? What, in general terms, do you think you would get? What kind
> of people would you hire? How long would it take you to validate or
> invalidate your approach?
> 
> For me, I'd invest in some high-end workstations equipped with a handful
> of high-end boards and some 16 core threadripper processors. I'd have
> some more hardware in the server room, enough to test and validate but
> not a whole-hog data center. I'd try to identify a handful of high
> aptitude individuals and give each the right to hire 2-3 underlings as
> both a "farm team" and to handle more mundane tasks. About half of each
> work week would be scouring journals, and other literature. Any young
> organization in hightech will need to acquire information FAST. The
> other half of the week will be getting technologies working in-house. As
> I mentioned previously, I see AI, neural interfacing and VR as being the
> pillars of the singularity. I'll give the team the freedom to work on
> whatever they'll be most effective at on any given day but the goal is
> to develop each to the point where synnergies can start happening and
> things can take off. I think VR can be a focus because games are Pretty
> Good, only a few more orders of magnitude on the physics front can
> really go a long way.
> 
> I also think that putting a synthetic person together as soon as
> possible will be a critical step to identifying the missing pieces.
> 
> On the AI front, I'd like to take some of the most promising systems
> such as Eliasmith's spaun (which was running at 1 second per hour) and
> see if I can optimize and scale it enough to operate on usable
> timescales. The fundamental problem is that there are a lot of ideas out
> there but it requires massive numbers of other things to be working in
> order to test them, being able to jump in and test sutff in an hour or
> two can be revolutionary.
> 
> --
> Please report bounces from this address to a...@numentics.com
> 
> Powers are not rights.
> 
> --
> 
> Stefan Reich
> 
> BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery
> options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2aea40abd4ff90cb-Mb1f06180ca6513cac73a9b6c>


-- 
Stefan Reich
BotCompany.de // Java-based operating systems

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T2aea40abd4ff90cb-Mfabe0a78aba1b5047d0309bc
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to