Matt > "The paper looks like a collection of random ideas with no coherent structure or goal...."
Argh... I love this style of paper whenever YKY publishes something my eyes are on it. So few (if any) are written this way, it's a terse jazz fusion improv of mecho-logical-mathematical thought physics needed to describe AGI concept. Immediately on the first version when I saw the navigating the labyrinth of "thinking" I thought of the quantum many paths simultaneity in photosynthesis and YKY mentioning the discovery of a possible correlation of Schrödinger and RL... but that item was yanked in the second iteration. That's OK, sometimes while on the vanguard of thought viewers eyes must be shielded from that which they explicitly fear the most...coincidentally sometimes which is totally obvious thus suspending disbelief while maintaining a referential propriety and contemporary academic interestingness. Also yanked was the expression of the notion for the AGI requirement of approximating K-complexity which in that I agree is where all the good stuff is…. generally and/or specifically… IMO this where the multi-agent consciousness mechanics come in but I’ll shield some eyes on that one :) John From: Stefan Reich via AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 4:21 PM To: AGI <agi@agi.topicbox.com> Subject: Re: [agi] My AGI 2019 paper draft Good review On Fri, Apr 19, 2019, 22:02 Matt Mahoney <mattmahone...@gmail.com <mailto:mattmahone...@gmail.com> > wrote: It would help to get your paper published if it had an experimental results section. How do you propose to test your system? How do you plan to compare the output with prior work on comparable systems? What will you measure? What benchmarks will you use (for example, image recognition, text prediction, robotic performance)? The paper looks like a collection of random ideas with no coherent structure or goal. The math seems to confuse or mislead rather than explain. For example you show father(x,y) as a function in the real plain rather than a predicate over discrete variables. This is interesting for a moment, but doesn't go anywhere, so you move on to the next topic. The whole paper is like this, plugging variables from one field of study into equations from another and hoping something useful comes out. I know that you are just full of ideas. But actually writing some code that does something interesting might really help in sorting out the useful ideas from the ones that go nowhere and advance the field of AGI. On Fri, Apr 19, 2019, 9:15 AM YKY (Yan King Yin, 甄景贤) <generic.intellige...@gmail.com <mailto:generic.intellige...@gmail.com> > wrote: Hi, This is my latest draft paper: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12v_gMtq4GzNtu1kUn9MundMc6OEhJdS8 I submitted the same basic idea in AGI 2016, but was rejected by some rather superficial reasons. At that time, reinforcement learning for AI was not widely heard of, but since then it has become a ubiquitous hot topic. I hope this time I can get published, as it would allow me to share my ideas more easily with other researchers and mathematicians so that I could solicit their help and improve my theory, possibly starting the coding project as well. Comments and suggestions are welcome 😊 -- YKY "The ultimate goal of mathematics is to eliminate any need for intelligent thought" -- Alfred North Whitehead <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T3cad55ae5144b323-Mbb5b80e2c5cc7f35c809e922> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T3cad55ae5144b323-M5270f3477e3d62edc3b33160 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
