On Wednesday, August 28, 2019, at 4:07 PM, WriterOfMinds wrote: > Are you sure you wouldn't be better served by calling your ideas some other > names than "consciousness" and "qualia," then? We're all getting "hung-up > on" the concepts that those terms actually refer to.
Good question. That's what been going on already. But in this age of intelligence it's time to take back what is ours and also preserve human consciousness. Also, human machine communications are better served by calling it thus IMO. And why let narrow minded visionaries control the labeling? That's a control strategy. Shoot for the stars. Consciousness is the full package, not little bits and pieces to tiptoe around. This might be premature but at some point it'll be trendy to call it as it is IMO. On Wednesday, August 28, 2019, at 4:07 PM, WriterOfMinds wrote: > I do not see how communication protocols have anything to do with > consciousness as it is usually understood. People communicate their conscious experiences no? Machines do that too :) Machines use communication protocols. John ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T41ac13a64c3d48db-M80abe3880277b7daf241686e Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
