Well, if there is a definition of "lossy" that is consistent with "lossless" it certainly isn't in the vernacular nor in the canonical technical usage of those terms.
What's you argot? On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 1:31 PM John Rose <johnr...@polyplexic.com> wrote: > On Thursday, October 10, 2019, at 2:26 PM, James Bowery wrote: > > KC can be approximated *only* with lossless compression. > > > Thanks for that valuable tidbit, but did you imply earlier that lossy and > lossless are mutually exclusive? I'm not convinced of that but am not an > expert .... even though I spent some time in the 90's exclusively on > compression research. > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8c8ee84b385720a5-M058d505516bbfc19137d2232> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8c8ee84b385720a5-M69bd7f733b8415f2271a2cc1 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
