You have apparently never bothered to decompress a zip file you've downloaded.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:51 AM John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > While performing thought experiments on an AGI model I realized that there > is no purely lossless compression. Something is always lost. For most > practical purposes yes lossless exists. This might sound trivially obvious > and non-obvious but it does impact the theory in the model. > > In other words, I could not imagine any purely lossless compression, it > might physically exist I just can't imagine it as I'm not a physicist. So > maybe it does exist? or perhaps we just prefer it to be so... I suppose > it's the same as saying true and false don't purely exist as crisp > booleans. And, exists doesn’t purely exist…so everything is relative. But > the implications are enormous when dealing with chaotic and complex systems > models. Thus it being trivially obvious and trivially non-obvious or, > non-trivially non-obvious... or... > > Net effect? Zero. Oh wait zero doesn't fully exist now does it. WTH? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwZwkk7q25I > > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5ff6237e11d945fb-Mce05fa9f1ab04ee9cd87e46f> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5ff6237e11d945fb-M819c2f80de8dd99872483815 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
