One needs to define the ability to predict consequences of various actions in order to program an AGI. If you don't want to call that "science" that's fine. I don't care what you call it. But Ron Freeman certainly takes that as attempting to "define science".
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 8:42 AM Matt Mahoney <mattmahone...@gmail.com> wrote: > You don't need to define science. Occam's Razor works as the basis for > choosing theories in all branches of science because all possible > probability distributions over the countably infinite set of strings must > favor shorter strings. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T42db51de471cbcb9-Mf2e3b73dc00f655c6e47e17b> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T42db51de471cbcb9-M25eed6203705402656b94060 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
