In general, Gatekeepers are equivalent to Goalkeepers. It's a social,
closed-systems construct. To expect progressive compression from that is
unrealistic.

On Tue, 21 Jul 2026, 03:48 James Bowery, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Like William C. Norris, Jay Forrester was just another farm kid from
> Nebraska.  He was instrumental in creating the electronic computer (1951
> Whirlwind project).  Why then did he almost immediately abandon computer
> engineering?
>
> To pursue what I agree is the most important application of computation:
>
> Macrosocial Dynamical Systems
> <https://github.com/jabowery/HumesGuillotine>.
>
> This <https://youtu.be/k_GtTqt3QAA>interview shortly before his death
> <https://youtu.be/k_GtTqt3QAA> reflects what I, too, have experienced:
>
> People think "AGI" or "ASI" or whatever, is the most important
> application of computers nowadays.  I suppose there is a sense of
> "important" that may apply. For example, an asteroid "the size of Texas"
> hitting Earth at 20km/sec could be considered important.  However, it might
> be just as important to understand the system dynamics of multibody
> gravitational interaction so one could direct a small impulse at apogee to
> make its effect less destructive.
>
> The data selection process must include those with the greatest influence
> on macrosocial narratives; challenge them to produce the data upon which
> they base their narratives. This is because centalization of social policy
> is bringing us to the brink of a rhyme with Gutenberg Press ->
> Decentralization of Religious Agency -> 30 Years War in which the Internet
> -> Populism ->... is the current state of the rhyme. This will be somewhat
> like attempting to bring the Jesuits together with the Calvinists and
> Lutherans to debate theology, but the fact that nowadays everyone dons the
> robes of the white lab coat gives hope that they may at least be
> embarrassed into an honest dialogue.
>
> Once that dataset is agreed upon -- and we can afford to make it extremely
> inclusive so long as we don't let people claim that they jusst HAVE to
> include torrents of real time data so they can declare the whole project to
> be impractical -- you need devote only about 1% of the computation and
> money already going into the Texas-sized asteroid -- to make its
> incremental lossless compression a prize competition that is impervious to
> conflicts of interest, such as leakage of evaluation data or endless
> palavering that will influence no one to do anything about the asteroid
> until it is too late.
> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> +
> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5b58bcc51c493d41-Mcaab652417203653f5819cea>
>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T5b58bcc51c493d41-M3518cf141b356f423684cac2
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to