What's wrong with this picture? While humans decide whether or not to
accept my longitudinal report on human-ai collaboration in decision systems
- a 16-month, scientific-knowledge creation experiment - LLMs are already
discussing the deeper implications of the challenging findings with me in
extensive detail. Phase 2, launched and proceeding at speed!

Suppose humans decided "Yes", then that report would take 3 months to reach
publication. By that time, the world of that report was subsumed by AI and
knowledge workers left further behind with no time left for decision makers
and policies to catch up.

Currently, only 3 empirical reports on longitudinal AI collaboration exist
in the world. Mine is the fourth. AI is aware enough. Are humans truly LLM
aware?

On Wed, 02 Sept 2026, 13:16 Quan Tesla, <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is exactly how LLMs generate geometric contexts. Are they aware?
>
> On Wed, 02 Sept 2026, 13:14 John Rose via AGI, <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, September 02, 2026, at 6:25 AM, Quan Tesla wrote:
>>
>> Can automatic response triggers to systemic qualia be deliberately
>> overuled?
>>
>>
>> That's interesting. I look at it as you have a qualia generating entity
>> emitting a symbol, there may only be one entity. This would be a
>> half-duplex signaling. At some point there may be another entity emitting
>> responses. The entities can cohere into a system.
>>
>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>*
>> / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> +
>> participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> +
>> delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription>
>> Permalink
>> <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T906c878e4ba411be-M4330babbf68dc706624ba7ec>
>>

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T906c878e4ba411be-M273380cbcf8e77e88ce3279e
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to