Anastasios Tsiolakidis wrote: > On 29/08/2012, at 10.52, Ian W Eberhart <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Anastasios, I don't think you've actually said anything yet, > > A blessing in disguise! What I have said in the general sense, on and > off the list, is that I would like to see a tight AGI focus, ie if the > answer to a question is not seen as critical to AGI then we should keep > it for another forum. Specifically I don't see how mastery of the neuron > will help anyone towards AGI. The same could be said about LM741' unless > someone is seriously considering stringing together a few billion of them
I was responding to Steve's posts about analog computing. I was also trying to highlight some issues in reverse-engineering the "neural code". As I said, my post was meant to highlight a different perspective in thinking about how to code an AI... =\ That said, I really don't know much about analog computing and don't really understand all that much about opamps anyway. =\ -- E T F N H E D E D Powers are not rights. ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
