Aaron,

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Aaron Hosford <[email protected]> wrote:

> They just cut the cost of patents in half (while also reducing their
>> value), so it won't cost much to claim your territory.
>
>
> Just out of curiosity, what is the cost?
>

As I recall, for 20 claims that includes 3 independent claims, described in
<100 pages, the base fee *WAS* ~$600 (now cut in ~half). You can increase
all these limits by paying various fees, e.g. $125 for each additional
independent claim. The patent attached to my posting cost ~$1,000 because
of its 30 total and 5 independent claims. Since this was submitted at the
very end of "first to invent", Craig didn't want ANY wrinkles that might
alter the filing date, so he spent another $400 on a professional
draftsman, who would scrupulously adhere to patent office drafting rules.
We had agreed to split the cost, so this experiment cost me ~$700.

Of course you can get an old version of Visio like I did for ~$10 from
eBay, ignore the complaints that it doesn't recognize Windows XP, and
follow the style in the drawings attached to my initial posting on this
thread, and skip the $400 expense.

You should check the fees on USPTO.gov, but a filing from a "micro entity"
like us will now cost ~$300. There are additional fees if/when the patent
is granted.

My own view is that patents are worthless unless you can afford to defend
them, which can cost 6-7 figures. If you must ask about the cost of getting
a patent, then you definitely can NOT afford to defend one.

Hence, your business plan MUST include SOME way of gaining access to enough
money to defend your turf, e.g. making a deal with the 2nd largest
infringer, to sue the largest infringer, which is a fairly common practice.

There are numerous other strategies, e.g. "You can have me AND my
technology for a big at paycheck", which can provide considerable
employment security - until they move to another technology.

Steve
=======================

> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Steve Richfield <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Matt,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Matt Mahoney <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Steve Richfield
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> But I'm not sure what you are trying to patent. The floating point
>>> >> hash probably has prior art so it is not patentable by itself.
>>> >
>>> > I looked but didn't find any.
>>>
>>> And neither will the USPTO. It's too much work. That's why you find so
>>> many duplicate patents covering the same invention. When you sue
>>> someone for infringing, then they will do the proper research to
>>> invalidate your patent.
>>>
>>> >> If it
>>> >> is one step in a longer process, then anyone could work around it by
>>> >> substituting an integer hash, which is technically superior anyway.
>>> >
>>> > Its ONLY use is in two isolated dependent claims, the loss of which
>>> wouldn't affect much of anything, especially since there are a couple of
>>> super-broad independent claims that are at a higher level than details of
>>> hashing.
>>>
>>> I know. "The system of the previous claim where the hash value is a
>>> floating point number", etc.
>>>
>>
>> Egad - you hacked my claims!!! Good job.
>>
>> Steve.
>>
>>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
>> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-2da819ff> |
>> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription
>> <http://www.listbox.com>
>>
>
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac> |
> Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription
> <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-- 
Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six
hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full
employment.



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to