It's never been done. If you can write an AGI program which would use multiple sensors and text then go and do it and show me how it's done. I know that is not a fair question because it is an extremely complicated problem and I have spent years thinking about without writing a program. However, it is a complicated question because we don't actually know how it is done. If there was an easy way to combine imagery and text and get AGI out of it then it would have been done because it has been tried. It is not easy because image analysis AGI does not yet exist. (That's why we are interested in this stuff, no one has actually figured it out.) My thesis here is that if I had a text-based AGI program I could adapt it to work with imagery and other sensory input within a year. And if someone developed an AGI program that worked with multiple sensors and possibly with robotics I could adapt the methods used to work with text-based AGI. Jim Bromer > From: [email protected] > > Jim Bromer claimed: > > However, without an effective AGI program the belief that > > adding sensors to a half-baked AGI theory might make it work has clearly > > been debunked by the history of AI/AGI. > > How so? > andi
------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
