agi  

Messages by Date

• 2015/06/26 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Dorian Aur
• 2015/06/26 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/26 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Tim Tyler
• 2015/06/26 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Dean Pomerleau
• 2015/06/26 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Mike Archbold
• 2015/06/25 RE: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/25 RE: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/25 RE: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Invalidating AGI designs (was Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard?) J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/25 [agi] The Mercedes Effect Steve Richfield
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Invalidating AGI designs (was Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard?) Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/25 [agi] Invalidating AGI designs (was Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard?) J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/25 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/24 RE: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/24 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/24 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/24 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/24 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/23 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/23 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Mark Seveland
• 2015/06/23 RE: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/22 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/22 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Samantha Atkins
• 2015/06/21 [agi] Open dare to the GOERTZEL Alan Grimes
• 2015/06/19 RE: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/19 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/19 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/06/19 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/18 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/06/17 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/17 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? Logan Streondj
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/16 [agi] Re: Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/16 Could Brain Emulation be NP-Hard? (was: Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation) Dean Pomerleau
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] Deep Learning Machine Beats Humans in IQ Test Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] Deep Learning Machine Beats Humans in IQ Test Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] Deep Learning Machine Beats Humans in IQ Test Logan Streondj
• 2015/06/16 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/15 [agi] Re: SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/15 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/15 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/15 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/15 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/15 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/06/15 Re: [agi] At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Roland Pihlakas
• 2015/06/15 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/14 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/14 RE: [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Nanograte Knowledge Technologies
• 2015/06/14 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/14 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/14 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/14 Re: [agi] Deep Learning Machine Beats Humans in IQ Test Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/14 Re: [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/14 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/13 Re: [agi] The API fallacy and the world's programmability J. Andrew Rogers
• 2015/06/13 [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness EdFromNH .
• 2015/06/13 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/13 [agi] Deep Learning Machine Beats Humans in IQ Test fpleyer76
• 2015/06/13 [agi] The API fallacy and the world's programmability Anastasios Tsiolakidis
• 2015/06/13 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/06/13 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/06/13 Re: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Anastasios Tsiolakidis
• 2015/06/12 RE: [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/12 [agi] distributive representation and linear dependence Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/06/12 Re: [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/12 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/12 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/12 [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness EdFromNH .
• 2015/06/11 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/11 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Matt Mahoney
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Mark Seveland
• 2015/06/10 [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness EdFromNH .
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] Combinatorics Is Important to Use With Discrete-Based AI Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] Combinatorics Is Important to Use With Discrete-Based AI Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/10 Re: [agi] Combinatorics Is Important to Use With Discrete-Based AI Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/09 RE: [agi] [offtopic] general H+ list? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/09 Re: [agi] [offtopic] general H+ list? Mark Seveland
• 2015/06/09 [agi] [offtopic] general H+ list? Alan Grimes
• 2015/06/08 Re: [agi] At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Mark Seveland
• 2015/06/08 [agi] ??????[agi] Combinatorics Is Important to Use With Discrete-Based AI Matt Lind
• 2015/06/08 [agi] Combinatorics Is Important to Use With Discrete-Based AI Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/08 Re: [agi] At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Kyle Kidd
• 2015/06/06 Re: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? TJ Katal
• 2015/06/06 [agi] Re: At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness EdFromNH .
• 2015/06/06 Re: [agi] WSI?!??!?!? TJ Katal
• 2015/06/06 Re: [agi] WSI?!??!?!? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/06 Re: [agi] WSI?!??!?!? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/06 Re: [agi] WSI?!??!?!? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/05 Re: [agi] WSI?!??!?!? TJ Katal
• 2015/06/05 Re: [agi] At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness Logan Streondj
• 2015/06/04 [agi] At last, an intuitive, explanatory, scientific theory of consciousness EdFromNH .
• 2015/06/04 Re: [agi] TrollBot Juan Carlos Kuri Pinto
• 2015/06/04 Re: [agi] MetaPartitioning the Discussion Group Dorian Aur
• 2015/06/04 [agi] TrollBot Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/03 Re: [agi] MetaPartitioning the Discussion Group Mike Archbold
• 2015/06/03 RE: [agi] MetaPartitioning the Discussion Group Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/03 RE: [agi] MetaPartitioning the Discussion Group Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/03 Re: [agi] MetaPartitioning the Discussion Group Mike Archbold
• 2015/06/03 Re: [agi] MetaPartitioning the Discussion Group Steve Richfield
• 2015/06/03 [agi] MetaPartitioning the Discussion Group Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/02 [agi] Peevish colin hales
• 2015/06/02 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI colin hales
• 2015/06/01 Re: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/01 RE: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/01 Re: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/01 Re: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Jim Bromer
• 2015/06/01 RE: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/01 Re: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Anastasios Tsiolakidis
• 2015/06/01 RE: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/06/01 Re: [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Aaron Hosford
• 2015/05/30 [agi] applicable : apply :: relevant : ? Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/30 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/30 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/29 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/29 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI colin hales
• 2015/05/28 [agi] VLS Planning Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/28 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/28 Re: [agi] Genifer 4.0 theoretical notes Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/27 [agi] Re: Genifer 4.0 theoretical notes Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/05/27 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/27 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/27 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/27 [agi] Genifer 4.0 theoretical notes Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/05/27 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/27 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Dorian Aur
• 2015/05/26 [agi] Overriding Deliberation Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/26 RE: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/26 Re: [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/25 [agi] SAT in P Will Bring AI Nearer to the Ideal of Tractable Experimentation Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/25 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/25 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/25 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Dorian Aur
• 2015/05/24 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/24 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI colin hales
• 2015/05/24 Re: [agi] Genifer 3.0 white paper Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/05/24 Re: [agi] Awareness Is Subject-Centric Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/24 [agi] Awareness Is Subject-Centric Jim Bromer
• 2015/05/24 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Dorian Aur
• 2015/05/24 RE: [agi] Genifer 3.0 white paper Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/24 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Benjamin Kapp
• 2015/05/24 Re: [agi] Genifer 3.0 white paper Yan King Yin, 甄景贤
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/23 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/23 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/23 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/23 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Ben Goertzel
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI ARAKAWA Naoya
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Benjamin Kapp
• 2015/05/22 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Dorian Aur
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Benjamin Kapp
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] Institute of General Intelligence (IGI) Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/22 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Logan Streondj
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Alan Grimes
• 2015/05/21 RE: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Piaget Modeler
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/21 [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Dorian Aur
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] Institute of General Intelligence (IGI) Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] Institute of General Intelligence (IGI) Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Benjamin Kapp
• 2015/05/21 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Benjamin Kapp
• 2015/05/20 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Mark Seveland
• 2015/05/20 Re: [agi] H-AGI towards S-AGI Colin Hales
• 2015/05/20 Re: [agi] Institute of General Intelligence (IGI) Benjamin Kapp

• Earlier messages
• Later messages