FW: [agi] What's preventing me from doing this AGI thing?

[Piaget Modeler via AGI]

Logan, 
Until you build an AGI without prediction as a proof that it isn't necessary, 
people like me are quite comfortable believing  that prediction IS necessary.
~PM

> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 06:10:37 -0500
> From: streo...@gmail.com
> To: a...@listbox.com; piagetmode...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: [agi] What's preventing me from doing this AGI thing?
> 
> prediction and AGI have almost nothing in common.
> I don't know why people here are so stuck up on it.
> 
> AGI isn't some simple gimmick,
> it is the integration of knowledge,
> which can be used to fullfill some purpose.
> 
> There is 0 prediction required,
> no prophecies, foretellings, enchantments w/e.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:51:24PM -0800, Piaget Modeler via AGI wrote:
> > If one used case based matching, then the algorithm could develop 
> > experience (i.e., bulid a case base) predicting arbitrary sequences of 
> > bits, and later apply this experience to unseen sequences. 
> > ~PM. 
> > 
                                                                                
  


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com