On 11/26/14, Logan Streondj via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > prediction and AGI have almost nothing in common. > I don't know why people here are so stuck up on it. >
Don't call it prediction, then, call it "reflecting upon the future state" or something else. Unless you are going to build a machine stuck in only a start state, you have to deal with future predictions, hypothesis, call it what you will. Mike A > AGI isn't some simple gimmick, > it is the integration of knowledge, > which can be used to fullfill some purpose. > > There is 0 prediction required, > no prophecies, foretellings, enchantments w/e. > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:51:24PM -0800, Piaget Modeler via AGI wrote: >> If one used case based matching, then the algorithm could develop >> experience (i.e., bulid a case base) predicting arbitrary sequences of >> bits, and later apply this experience to unseen sequences. >> ~PM. >> > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
