> > My view is that AGI is *required* if human beings are going to have any > vibrant future at all and required within the next few decades. Why? > Humans, and logically any technological species, evolve with certain > species characteristics including limitations on their effective > intelligence and ability to work cooperatively well together. As a > runaway technological acceleration occurs the species eventually hits a > point where its effective intelligence is ineffective in capacity and > speed for coming up with timely good enough solutions to more and more > complex and rapidly developing problems. Eventually, without either AGI > or rewriting its own nature significantly, the species fails to make > good enough choices followed through well enough to avoid calamity. > > > - samantha >
Samantha, what evidence is there of other comparable human species evolutionfollowing this scenario you've outlined? Is this a conjecture on your part or has this happened before, and if so, when? Kindly advise, ~PM ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
