Amara, You can get a PDF of the memristor/CMOS article I described at the start of this thread at http://mysbfiles.stonybrook.edu/~klikharev/personal/ArXiv14.pdf
P.S. The picture next to your email is too dim for me to tell, but are you the lady from Kurzweil who was wearing a Google Glass and who sat across from me briefly at a table at the major party held at the Toward a Science of Consciousness 2014 conference in Tuscon? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Amara D. Angelica <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, Ed. Do you have a link for this? Couldn’t find it on the server. Tnx - > Amara > > From: "EdFromNH ." <[email protected]> > Reply-To: <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, September 24, 2015 at 1:56 PM > To: AGI <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [agi] A neuromorphic computer with more synapses and neurons > than a human brain that runs 500 times as fast on one or two thousand watts. > > Thanks, justcamel. I did not know that. > > I am amazed there has not been more discussion on this list about my > neuromorphic post above. The article I described in it, along with other > articles I have read, imply we may well be within a relatively few years > from having hardware with almost twice as many neurons and synapses as the > human cortex on one 300mm silicon wafer, which could be manufactured at a > marginal cost of $7,000 to $15,000, and would only consume about one > kilowatt. Of course, there is more to making a roughly human-level AGI than > that, but such relatively inexpensive and incredibly powerful AGI hardware > could greatly accelerate the advent of machine superintelligence. > > Given that we already know how to perform deep learning, and many other > AGI algorithms, efficiently on neural net hardware, I should think the > people on this mailing list who are truly interested in AGI would be > extremely interested in the advances in neuromorphic computing. > Neuromorphic computing is almost certainly is the path that will lead to > powerful AGI. But based on the deafening silent response of this mailing > list to my above post, it seems not. > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:09 AM, justcamel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Your own contributions to the mailing list don not end up in your inbox >> ... just check out the mailing list "directly" ... >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/ >> >> On 22.09.2015 02:25, EdFromNH . wrote: >> >>> [[[[[P.S. I am resending this because this intended content didn't >>> arrive until the 4th entry in the prior thread in which I tried to discuss >>> this.]]]]] >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> AGI >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now >> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/8630185-a57a74e1 >> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >> > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/231629-9c2b470d> | Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
