I liked the article. I think it is interesting/telling that a lot of the article is focused on defining distinctions in all the definitions that about for general intelligence -- we don't even really know or at least agree upon what the problem is in the first place, let alone how to solve it. But Iiked that catchall definition that appears early on. There are a couple of typos (I will reread this soon and correct if I get around to it.) Also, perhaps the present limitations of AGI could be moved up somewhere near the top since so many people seem to be fearful of AGI. Mike A
On 12/1/15, colin hales <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > --------------------- > "A recent approach is a revival/extension of the idea of AGI as an > artificial scientist. In mandating fully embodied autonomous learning of the > verifiably a-priori unknown, it presents an onerous technical obligation on > AGI designers. This technical burden does, however, purchase the benefit of > formally revealing the presence of all the cognitive faculties necessary in > human level intelligence. Its deliverable 'laws of nature', however > contrived and simple, are deeply novel (to AGI, designers and testers) and > double-blind testable in a way that removes humans from any part of the > ultimate scientific proof of AGI. Any embodied AGI contender can submit to > the testing, thereby offering the possibility of a formal testing facility > divorced from the activities of all designers (Hales, 2014). The future of > this idea remains to be seen." > > > Hales, C. G. (2014). The Revolutions of Scientific Structure. Singapore, > World Scientific. > --------------------------- > > or distillation thereof .... I'd have thought the ideas deserved of a > mention as a recent entry on the scene. Am I sufficiently > Shaw-unreasonable? > > regards, > > Colin > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Ben Goertzel" <[email protected]> > Sent: 1/12/2015 3:29 AM > To: "AGI" <[email protected]> > Subject: [agi] Scholarpedia article on AGI published > > > > No new concepts here, I just wanted there to be a standard reference for the > topic... > > > http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Artificial_General_Intelligence > > > > > > > -- > > Ben Goertzel, PhD > http://goertzel.org > > "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress > depends on the unreasonable man." -- George Bernard Shaw > > AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
