Perhaps I should write an article about 'my' Universal Abstraction Theory'... What is wrong about that? For one thing all of the problems writing an AGI program are going to still be there. I would only be shifting the discussion to the framework of the abstractions behind computer programming (and I would have to show a few examples of how they could be related to conceptual formations.) I would not actually be describing a way to make an AGI program viable. Why not? The abstractions would have to be potentially capable of 'reaching' AGI. But the problem is that they could also potentially reach any kind of computer program. The idea that the universality of an abstraction about computer programming would be viable to be treated as a universal abstraction of AGI is a conflation.
------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
