Thursday, December 12, 2002, 1:19:47 AM, Cliff Stabbert wrote: A clarification:
CS> I'm not quite getting their "generic space" and CS> "blended space" concepts; it all seems a bit forced and CS> overabstracted. In their monk-mountain and regatta-race examples I get the "mental overlapping of the same space on two different occasions" point, where drawing neat diagrams of blended spaces makes some sense; I just don't get the generalization of this to other classes of problem, where it seems forced. -- Cliff ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
