On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:31:14PM -0500, Dennis Gorelik wrote: > Eugen, > > 1) Google uses relatively simple algorithms. > But it does a lot of data mining (because of volume).
This is pure semantics. Let's agree to disagree. > 2) Over 99% of intelligence of any human being came from other people > (society). No. Society doesn't help me see and walk. I can still function if the rest of the humanity would disappear into thin air. Since I don't assume you're trolling, your model of what general AI is pretty wack. > Google does the same. > > 3) Machine vision is irrelevant to strong AI. Sorry, but this is rubbish. AI has been attained when a robot can navigate in cluttered surroundings, and can solve simple tasks. (Which is another of places where neither Google nor LISP are going to be of any help). > Blind people can be very intelligent without any vision at all. > Over 99% humans doesn't construct semantic image in the way different > from what Google does. Sure, whatever. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp80mXTf4RzR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
