Russell Wallace wrote: > On 6/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > What I said in my previous reply was that something very like neural > nets > (with all the beneficial features for which people got interested in > NNs in > the first place) *can* do syntax, and all forms of abstract > representation. > > > Clearly they can - we're an existence proof of that - my claim being > only that it won't be easy. > > Has anyone yet made an artificial NN or anything like one handle syntax?
Uhhh: did you read my first post on this thread? Richard Loosemore --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using Endymion MailMan. http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/ ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
