Hi,

On 11/6/06, James Ratcliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ben,
  I think it would be beneficial, at least to me, to see a list of tasks.
Not as a "defining" measure in any way.  But as a list of work items that a
general AGI should be able to complete effectively.

I agree, and I think that this requires a lot of care.  Carefully
articulating such a list is on my agenda for the first half of next
year (not that it will take full-time for 6 months, it will be a
"background task").  My approach will be based on porting a number of
basic ideas from human developmental psychology into the
non-human-like-AGI-acting-in-a-simulation-world domain, but will also
be useful beyond this particular domain...

 My thoughts on a list like this is that is should be marked in increasing
levels of difficulty, so an initial AGI should have the ability to complete
the first level of tasks and so on.

Agreed, although most tasks will have the notion of "partial
completion" rather than being binary in nature.

Ex: One item of AI task is a simple question answering ability, that can
respond with an answer currently in the Knowledge base of the system.
A more expansive item, would require the QA task to go and get outside
information.

This seems not to be a very well-specified task ;-) ... the problem is
that it refers to the internal state of the AI system (its "knowledge
base"), whereas the tasks I will define will refer only to the
system's external behaviors given various sets of stimuli...

-- Ben

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

Reply via email to