Russell> On 1/28/07, Eric Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How do you respond to the 20-question argument that there are only >> of order 2^20 "knowledge items" ? >>
Russell> The granularity of knowledge items for 20 Questions and the Russell> number 20 are specifically chosen to match each other, to Russell> make the game fair. While never explicitly stated, everyone Russell> understands that e.g. 'a book' is a fair topic for 20 Russell> Questions, but 'Alice in Wonderland' is not. Yet we do know Russell> about 'Alice in Wonderland', and any attempt to duplicate Russell> human abilities must take that into account. Eric> Have you ever played 20 questions? In the games I've played, Eric> Alice in Wonderland would be a fine topic. I admit its Eric> surprising that one plays as well as one does. I haven't played 20 questions recently, but in response to your comment I just went to www.20q.net and played thinking of Alice in Wonderland, the book. The neural net guessed "is it a novel" on question 22, and then decided it had gone far enough and said "you won, but 20q guessed it eventually". However, I have distinct recollections of, last time I played, a human player guessing my thought of a specific radio station. Of course, 20q.net cheats by asking multimodal questions (animal,vegetable, or mineral) so more than 2^20 possibilities. ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
