Unambiguous syntax is trivial and all computer languages have this ability. Why not use Java instead of Lojban if only non ambiguity is important? (I don't advocate this at all!)
Lojban provides syntactically-unambiguous, semantically-minimally-ambiguous description of **comonsense knowledge** So does CycL and other predicate logic dialects, but those are waaaay more awkward to use than Lojban, and have far worse internal ontologies as well -- Ben G ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
