> > Intelligence - we're talking about storing and flipping bits -
> > minimalistically that's it.  How many variables will it take to come
> up with
> > an equation?  6?  7?  Some of the variables are specific and some may
> be
> > general.  One may be a measurement of complexity, one a vector set
> including
> > a generalized description of goals?, I don't know...another a KR?
> Either
> > way there are just a few variables going on here and someone needs to
> > propose a few candidate equations for review.  Perhaps there are some
> in
> > previous posts that I missed or do I need to come up with something
> myself
> > :).
> 
> I'm afraid it is not so simple, otherwise we shouldn't still arguing
> about what the goal of AI really is after more than 50 years.
> 
> Pei

I always thought the goal of AI was implicitly understood and AI is just a
fancy form of IO with zero or greater storage and zero or more feedback
loops.  Intelligence is just different contortions or multiples of this
basic setup, plus a few other things related to the state and composition of
the object with AI.  Intelligence may not be a single value like a
temperature but the constituent components could be weighted and represented
with a general number.  So a rock has close to zero intelligence and
Einstein has n units and a fish is somewhere in between.  But if you were
comparing Einstein with Confucius you'd have to look at some constituent
intelligence vectors (or some other mathematical construct) of each person
to compare.  We don't need to get overly complicated on this do we?

John

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936

Reply via email to